University of North Dakota GPA, SAT Scores, ACT Scores

Response Inhibition Of Children With And Without Adhd...

Ornstein, T., Max, J., Schachar, R., Dennis, M., Barnes, M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Levin, H. (2013). Response inhibition in children with and without ADHD after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychology, 7(1), 1-11. doi:10.1111/j.1748-6653.2012.02027.x Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) share many of the same symptoms and in some cases, ADHD is even a consequence of TBI. This is known as secondary ADHD (S-ADHD). Likely due to impaired frontostriatal systems, we see a similarities in children with ADHD, S-ADHD, and TBI. Ornstein et. al. (2013) compared children with ADHD and those with TBI that did not have pre-injury ADHD on their performance on a stop signal paradigm (SSP), response†¦show more content†¦Ornstein et. al. (2013) seek to answer three critical questions. First, is the magnitude of inhibitory control deficits similar when looking at developmental and acquired forms of ADHD. Second, is TBI itself associated with inhibitory control deficits, or do we only see these deficits in those whom suffered a TBI and have been diagnosed with S-ADHD. And finally, does the magnitude of response inhibition deficits vary with the severity of the TBI. When testing the subjects, ch ildren with developmental ADHD that were being treated with medication had the medication withheld for 48 hours before testing to eliminate the effects of the medication on their cognitive performance. It is also important to note that none of the children with S-ADHD were medicated at the time of the study. The diagnostic criteria used to diagnose ADHD was via the DSM-IV. The severity of subjects whom had suffered a TBI were based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), commonly used to diagnose severity of brain injury. To determine S-ADHD, the researchers used the Ontario Child Health Survey Scales-Revised (OCHS-R), which was completed by both parents and teachers of the children involved in the study, focusing on the behaviors exhibited over the past six months. The subjects than used the SSP test to determine their speed when executing and voluntarily inhibiting a motor response. It involved two concurrent tasks which gauge reaction time as well as accuracy.

Mercutios role in Verona is 1 of the princes kinsman and he is a friend of Romeo and Benvolios Essay Example For Students

Mercutios role in Verona is 1 of the princes kinsman and he is a friend of Romeo and Benvolios Essay His involvement in the play up until this point is limited but he was the 1 along with Benvolio that persuaded Romeo to gatecrash the Capulet ball to show him that there are more women than Rosyline. And he was there to taunt the Capulet nurse when she comes to tell Romeo of the marriage. In the beginning of act 3 scene 1 Mercutio and Benvolio are wondering around the town square of Verona on a very hot day Mercutio decides to take a dip in the local fountain Benvolio tells Mercutio to come in off the streets because the Capulets are wondering around and if they meet they will not scape a brawl The tension in the scene in the Zefferelli version of the film is created in the heat and in the Lurhman film it is created by the music it is very dramatic music and makes you think that something bad is going to happen. Mercutios response to Benvolio trying to tell him to get off the streets and warning him that the Capulets are coming shows us that he is very stubborn and ignorant, when Benvolio says By my heart here come the Capulets when Tybalt and the rest of the Capulets show up, Mercutio replies By my heel I care not. Romeos relationship with Mercutio is like best friends almost like brothers Mercutio is always looking out for Romeo and protecting him. The fight in the Zefferelli version breaks out when Romeo shakes Tybalts hand and Tybalt looks at his hand in disgust and washes it in the fountain where Mercutio is bathing, he then splashes Mercutio with water and Mercutio becomes annoyed and will not stand for it he jumps out of the fountain in a rage and starts the fight, but the most antagonistic person is Tybalt. In the Lurhmann version things arent a lot different, Tybalt arrives and is looking for Romeo, Mercutio wants a fight with Tybalt but Tybalt doesnt want to fight with him he jus wants to kill Romeo, when Romeo arrives Tybalt proceeds to kick his butt and Mercutio is annoyed and goes over to help Romeo out he pulls Tybalt off Romeo and throws him onto sum broken shards of glass, Romeo Mercutio are then talking when Tybalt grabs 1 of the shards of glass and lunges at Romeo but hits Mercutio under Romeos arm, but that would never of happened if Mercutio had just left Tybalt and Romeo alone to fight each other. The language of Mercutio after he has sustained his wound continues to show that he is a comedian and even in death cannot be serious. It Is a bit harsh that Mercutio has bin murdered, but if he didnt try and be funny and play his injury down to be less serious he mite of bin able to get some help and maybe survived. The two different Mercutios are completely different one is the typical Elizabethan bloke with his dress and everything the other is the complete opposite, a 20th century afro Caribbean man with loud shirts and dread locks, not exactly how you would imagine Mercutio after reading the play. Similarities between the two are few and far between but there are some. There attitude, they are both very funny characters and play the comedian of the production, the relationships he has with other characters such as Benvolio, Romeo and the Capulets, the way they antagonize Tybalt in this scene and the way they use language and expressions. This is mostly down to the fact that both films use the same script written by Shakespeare and arent modernized in the speech part. .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 , .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .postImageUrl , .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 , .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:hover , .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:visited , .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:active { border:0!important; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:active , .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7 .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u505448f3217ca80ffe66a8a261a50ec7:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Frankenstein and Sleepy Hollow EssayThere are also differences though, much like they are similar in their attitude, relationships, antagonism and language they are also different in these aspects at the same time. Like the Lurhmann Mercutio is a lot more aggressive and is stronger than the Zefferelli character and he is also a lot more camp. The Zefferelli character is a lot more funny but he seems to be a skinny weakling and isnt very good at much just messing about. I think the most convincing character for me is the Lurhmann one because it is more modern and is easier to understand and he is a lot harder and I cant see the skinny little Zefferelli attempt being able to stand up for Romeo very well.